PATANJALI
YOGASUTRAS
CHAPTER-4
KAIVALYA PAADHA
KAIVALYA PAADHA essentially deals with how
the state of Samadhi transforms us. It
is a pointer to its essential characteristics. The following sutras deal with (i) is the mind the real perceiver (ii) who illumines the mind, and (iii) Can there be more than one mind, one illumining and the other perceiving
Vs.4.19
na tat svabhaasam drishyatvat
Ø na = is not
Ø tat = it
Ø svabhaasam = self illuminating
Ø drishyatvat = knowability
We assume that our mind is the perceiver of all
external objects and matters. While this appears to be true apparently, the
mind itself is an object of perception for the Purusha, the pure consciousness,
The Purusha remains the witness and perceives everything through the mind and
the mind itself. This being so, the mind is not the power that actually
perceives. This power lies with the Purusha. Purusha’s power only reflects
through the mind. That is why, this sutra says
that the mind itself is not self-illuminating, but, is the object of perception
Vs. 4.20
eka-samaye cha
ubhaye anavadharanam
Ø eka-samaye = at the same time
Ø cha = and
Ø ubhaye = both
Ø anavadhaaranam = cannot be
cognized
We know that mind itself can be cognized. But, the whole cognition
process happens only through the mind.
It must be clear to us that cognition of the mind and cognition of the
external matters and objects cannot happen simultaneously through the same mind
itself.
Vs. 4.21
chitta antara drishye
buddhi-buddheh atiprasangah
smriti sankarah cha
Ø chitta = of the mind
Ø antara = another
Ø drishye = seen
Ø buddhi-buddheh = perceiver of perception
Ø atiprasangah = abundance
Ø smriti = remembering
Ø sankarah = confusion
Ø cha = and
This sutra examines the possibility
that there is in fact another mind which illumines the mind which perceives. If
the mind which perceives and cognizes is to be illumined by another mind, then,
who illumines that mind which illumines the perceiving mind. There will be an
endless series of minds which cognize – each its next lower level mind.
This assumption even prima facie,
appears to be clearly a meaningless assumption.
* *
* E N
D * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment